Back to blog

COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates in BC Workplaces

COVID-19 vaccination policies in BC workplaces are giving rise to a number of provincial legal implications and public policy considerations that should be carefully considered by all employers as they deliberate on whether to implement a workplace policy concerning COVID-19 vaccinations for their employees.

It is this writer’s position that employers can implement such a workplace policy, but that they must be vigilant of applicable laws and employee interests as they do so.

The primary legal issues that create tensions as employers decide whether to implement a COVID-19 vaccination policy are: (1) workplace health and safety; (2) human rights considerations; and (3) privacy protection of personal healthcare information.


COVID-19 has given rise to an unparalleled global pandemic over the last two years. As government restrictions ease up at times, and more employees are returning to their workplaces with the advent of COVID-19 vaccinations, employers are faced with ensuring that their workplace remains safe.

A recent poll by KPMG Canada identified that 62 per cent of small- and medium-sized businesses are planning to make COVID-19 vaccine mandates. 

As the law in this area expands and adjusts, it is important for all employers to understand how existing legislation interacts with and should inform their decision of whether to implement a COVID-19 vaccination workplace policy.

WorkSafeBC Considerations

One of the primary legal issues concerning COVID-19 vaccination policies and mandates in BC workplaces is workplace health and safety. Arguably, the primary reason for implementing a COVID-19 vaccination policy is to increase safety in the workplace, for workers and the public alike, by reducing the risks of the transmission and negative health effects of COVID-19 and its variants.

WorkSafeBC is an organization created by BC’s Workers Compensation Act (the “WCA”). WorkSafeBC’s mandate is to create a province free from workplace injury and illness, and to help British Columbians have safe working conditions.

The WCA has an associated regulation called the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (the OHSR). The OHRS applies to all employers, workers, and persons working in or contributing to the production of any industry that falls within the scope of the WCA— which happens to be the great majority of workplaces in our province.

The OHRS provides at section 2.2 that: “Despite the absence of a specific requirement, all work must be carried out without undue risk of injury or occupational disease to any person.”

As a result, employers have a duty to provide safe workplaces in accordance with the WCA, its regulations, and WorkSafeBC policies and guidelines, and conversely, workers have the right to refuse unsafe work. It may be the case that as COVID-19 cases continue to rise and protection measures are reduced, employees may find themselves in a situation where they decide that they are not safe at their particular workplace and choose to raise concerns about unsafe work to their employer, who will need to respond to these concerns.

At this time, WorkSafeBC has provided the following statement in answer to the question of whether an employer can require a vaccination as a condition of employment:

“Every workplace is different, so individual employers should seek legal advice when developing a mandatory vaccination policy, as they need to address not only workplace health and safety and employees’ interests but also consider labour and employment issues.”

WorkSafeBC’s above answer does not provide clear direction on which specific workplace health and safety factors an employer should take into consideration when deciding whether or not to implement a COVID-19 vaccination policy or mandate, and it leaves the question open to employers and their legal counsel to determine. That being said, it is notable that WorkSafeBC has implemented its own mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy internally, for its own employees.

Human Rights Considerations

The other area of law that intertwines with the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination policies and mandates in the workplace is human rights. In our province, the applicable legislation that protects human rights is the BC Human Rights Code (the “HRC”). 

The purpose of the HRC is to prevent, identify, and eliminate specific types of discrimination prohibited by the HRC. The HRC sets out a list of personal characteristics that are protected by the HRC in the areas of employment, housing, receiving services, and publications. These personal characteristics include race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, religion, sex, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, physical disability, mental disability, marital status, family status, age, political belief, and summary or criminal conviction. 

In relation to employment, the HRC provides that employers have a duty not to discriminate against persons by refusing to employ or refusing to continue to employ them. In addition, the HRC provides that employers must not discriminate against a person regarding any term or condition of their employment. This includes a duty for employers to take all reasonable steps to avoid a negative effect based on a personal characteristic of an employee or potential employee— also known as the duty to accommodate.

Therefore, if an employer decides to implement a COVID-19 vaccination policy of any kind, they will need to be aware of their duty to accommodate employees who may have a protected characteristic that prevents them from being able to obtain a COVID-19 vaccination. The relevant personal characteristics that might be at issue are physical disability, mental disability, religion, and family status.

It is important for employers implementing new workplace policies to be open and honest with their employees and enter into good faith dialogues about what can be achieved through accommodating the particular employee, in regard to their protected personal characteristic. If you encounter a situation such as this, it is advisable to receive legal advice from an employment lawyer. 

While we have not seen a decision from the BC Human Rights Tribunal directly pertaining to mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policies at the time this article was written, the BC Human Rights Commissioner has made the following statement in October 2021, concerning COVID-19 vaccinations:

“Ultimately, it is the position of B.C.’s Human Rights Commissioner that duty bearers can in some circumstances implement a vaccination status policy such as proof-of-vaccination requirement—but only if other less intrusive means of preventing COVID-19 transmission are inadequate for the setting and if due consideration is given to the human rights of everyone involved.”

As well, the BC Human Rights Commissioner also notably stated:

“No one’s safety should be put at risk because of other people’s personal choices not to receive a vaccine, and no one should experience harassment or unjustified discrimination when there are effective alternatives to vaccination status policies.”

As an employer considering whether to implement a COVID-19 vaccination policy or mandate for your workplace, it is important to consider potential human rights obligations that your company may owe to its employees. 

Privacy Law Considerations

Employers inevitably collect personal, private information about their employees— such as direct deposit information, birth dates, emergency contact information, and an employee’s social insurance number (SIN). In workplaces that are not federally regulated, employers have duties under the Personal Information Protection Act (“PIPA”) to protect their employees’ private information. PIPA considers the collection, use, disclosure, protection of, and correction of a person’s private information. 

Therefore, when an employer is collecting COVID-19 vaccine-status related information about their employees, they must utilize the same types of best practices to protect their employee’s COVID-19 vaccination status as they would any other personal information of an employee.

While existing laws protecting personal privacy interests continue to apply, it will be helpful to receive some more specific direction from the Office of Information and Privacy Commissioner of BC (the “OIPC”) regarding best practices for employers as they choose whether to implement workplace policies concerning COVID-19 vaccinations and gather an employee’s personal health information. 

Employment Law Considerations

Employers often introduce new policies in their workplace and are legally able to do so. However, if an employer implements a workplace policy that leads to a unilateral change to a fundamental term of an existing employee’s employment contract, the employee may have the ability to assert constructive dismissal, exposing the employer to liability in regard to reasonable notice and other damages.

Requiring new employees to abide by an existing COVID-19 vaccination policy or mandate should be an easier feat. However, it is still important to consider whether the decision not to hire a particular employee due to their refusal to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, is because of a protected personal characteristic, which could give rise to a complaint at the BC Human Rights Tribunal.


In summary, while an employer can implement a workplace policy that concerns COVID-19 vaccinations, it is integral that employers be mindful of the landmine of related legal issues, such as workplace safety, human rights, privacy protection, and employment law generally when drafting and implementing such a policy. 

As a result, it is advisable for employers to speak with an employment lawyer before implementing a COVID-19 vaccination policy in their workplace. 

**Please note that the above article provides information for non-unionized, provincially regulated workplaces in British Columbia and is not applicable to unionized, federally regulated workplaces.**

This article was originally published by The Lawyer’s Daily (, part of LexisNexis Canada Inc.

The foregoing is the author’s own opinion and is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice. If you require legal advice, please contact the author, who would be pleased to discuss the issues above with you. 

Nikita Gush is an employment lawyer at Doak Shirreff Lawyers LLP. She can be reached at [email protected].